THE NINE IS OUT NOW

Phil Simon

THE WORLD’S LEADING INDEPENDENT WORKPLACE COLLABORATION & TECH EXPERT

Will Big Data End Ignorance and Racism?

Data is making it easier to disprove highly suspect claims in an equally public forum.
Mar | 12 | 2014

Mar | 12 | 2014
}

A spate of dumb tweets has been making the news of late. First, there was the Justine Sacco train wreck. By now, you’ve probably seen or at least heard of this gem:

tweet

Yes, it’s by a US Congressman. Maybe you’ve even read his rather tepid apology:

In the last 24 hours, I’ve had the opportunity to re-learn one of life’s lessons: whenever any of us are offering opinions, it is best to refer to people as individuals as opposed to groups. Last night, I publicly commented on the NBA and I sincerely apologize to those who I unfairly categorized. The NBA has many examples of players and owners who are role models for our communities and for our country. Those individuals did not deserve that criticism and I apologize. In addition, it’s been brought to my attention that I was mistaken and the NBA policy on drug enforcement is stronger than I previously believed. Again, I offer my sincere apologies for my comments.

The problem with Garofalo’s tweet is two-fold. First, someone in his position ought to be a bit more careful with his words. Hire an intern who understands “the Twitter” if you don’t. The second problem is more fundamental: He was factually incorrect, as a subsequent Deadspin piece manifests. The graphic below is from Do NBA Players Really Get Arrested More Than Usual? (No, Stop This).

Chart/illustration by Tommy Craggs, Deadspin

In point of fact, the incidence of arrests among NBA player is much, much lower than a series of cohorts. Of course, arrests of John Q. Public typically don’t make national or regional headlines. (See availability bias.)

People have always said dumb and politically correct things. That won’t change anytime soon. The difference today is distribution. Read: it’s never been easier to concurrently say them to billions of people.

Simon Says

No, Big Data won’t eliminate racism and ignorance. It does, however, make it easier to disprove highly suspect claims in an equally public forum.

Data is increasingly becoming the judge, jury, and executioner.

Feedback

What say you?


This post originally ran on Wired.

Receive my musings, news, and rants in your inbox as soon as they publish.

 

Blog E Data E Big Data E Will Big Data End Ignorance and Racism?

Related Posts

Outliers

ognitive decline terrifies me because, like many of you, I make my living with my brain. To keep it as spry as possible, I do a number of things. My morning ritual involves drinking coffee and playing several New York Times games. Wordle and...

The Beauty of Structured Data

Introduction Like many people, I read Stephen Covey's The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People when it came out. Although I understood the bestseller's popularity, I found it a tad simplistic. Strangely, though, one of his suggestions stuck with me over the years:...

Why I Often Answer Analytics Students’ Questions With Questions

Introduction I've written before about the parallels among poker, analytics, and Big Data. Brass tacks: To be successful at poker on a regular basis, one needs to constantly deal with incomplete information. The best players continually update their assumptions based...

Thoughts on Reaching 500 Google Scholar Citations

Introduction Back when I started writing books in 2008, I largely ignored whether academics cited my work—much less how often. In the whole scheme of things, it just didn't seem to matter at the time. This feeling continued well into 2014. Although I knew that a...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Blog E Data E Big Data E Will Big Data End Ignorance and Racism?

Next & Previous Posts

Related Posts

Outliers

ognitive decline terrifies me because, like many of you, I make my living with my brain. To keep it as spry as possible, I do a number of things. My morning ritual involves drinking coffee and playing several New York Times games. Wordle and...

The Beauty of Structured Data

Introduction Like many people, I read Stephen Covey's The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People when it came out. Although I understood the bestseller's popularity, I found it a tad simplistic. Strangely, though, one of his suggestions stuck with me over the years:...

Why I Often Answer Analytics Students’ Questions With Questions

Introduction I've written before about the parallels among poker, analytics, and Big Data. Brass tacks: To be successful at poker on a regular basis, one needs to constantly deal with incomplete information. The best players continually update their assumptions based...

Thoughts on Reaching 500 Google Scholar Citations

Introduction Back when I started writing books in 2008, I largely ignored whether academics cited my work—much less how often. In the whole scheme of things, it just didn't seem to matter at the time. This feeling continued well into 2014. Although I knew that a...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *