๐ŸŒ Public

Kindle and America's Decline?

Is one related to the other?
2-min read
SHARE
Kindle and America's Decline?
Photo by @felirbe / Unsplash

I am always fascinated by technology and change. I often think about one of Kranzberg's laws of technology, one of which is:

๐Ÿ’ฌ
Technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral.

Along these lines, there's an interesting article from the Brookings Institution on how Amazon's Kindle is manufactured:

...$40 to $50 in manufacturing value made off of every one of the 700,000 or so Kindles so far sold isnโ€™t bad, and Amazon seems well-positioned to capture the retail mark-up on the device and sell a ton of e-books, while Kindleโ€™s wireless data service, which uses Sprintโ€™s data network, resides in the U.S. Well, hereโ€™s the problem: Because E-Ink could not control the low-temperature polysilicon and the fabrication of the display, it could not perform the system integration required for it to capture the majority of the value-add at that stage. And because it could not manufacture the display, as Shih notes, the U.S. will likely miss out on the future industries that may spring from shop-floor tinkering with the display and its production--โ€œthings like large flexible displays, future generations of electronic signage, and plastic electronics.โ€

Amazon needs to go to countries that can produce e-ink at the lowest possible cost. Don't we consumers demand this? I'll bet you a Coke that the company sells more Kindles at $139 now compared to the Kindle 2's original price of $359.

Citation Sloths
Quoting a stat in a post or video? Great. Respect your audience by bringing your receipts.

Simon Says

My feelings about this piece are decidedly mixed. The article omits the fact that many companies and industries intentionally take losses on products. Perhaps the best example is the razor. Manufacturers have been known to give them away because the profits on blades more than offset the loss from giving away free razors. If this article's breakdown of the Kindle cost structure is accurate, then the same thing is happening with books: Amazon can lose money on the Kindle because it will make it upโ€”and then someโ€”by selling books.

This begs the question: Does any of this matter? If Amazon.com makes $5/book on the Kindle (and that's probably a fair estimate), then what's the problem? For Amazon.com, probably none.

How is this different?

For the US, that's a different story. However, the Kindle is hardly the only example of a product not entirely made in the USA. I went to school in Pittsburgh, a city decimated by the deindustrialization of the US. It has since reboundedโ€”sort of. Without getting all philosophical, with capitalism, the fleas come with the dog. What's good for a company may not be good for the country. How is this different?

What do you think?

Before You Go...
If you'd like to support my writing efforts, I'd appreciate it.

๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฃ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—”๐—จ๐—ง๐—›๐—ข๐—ฅ

Member discussion