Pick. Up. The. Phone.

Relying exclusively on e-mail is rarely wise.

Everyone at one point has received an e-mail (or 500) and thought, “What’s wrong with [insert name]?” As a medium, e-mail invites misunderstanding. It gives the appearance of in-person communication sans critical non-verbal cues.

Studies have found that the context and emotion of in our e-mails are only fully received about 50 percent of the time. Yes, its a coin flip. It’s a major point in my forthcoming book.

Looking Beyond the Data

I can cite stats like these all day long, but I find that stories are often just as valuable in making salient points, perhaps more so.

I recently interviewed Marillion keyboardist Mark Kelly. We chatted a bit before recording, talking about football, boxing, and e-mail as a communications medium. Kelly revealed something that shocked me a bit: Even for a band that’s been together for more than three decades, e-mail occasionally engenders misunderstandings. Let me repeat that: Guys who have known each other for a really, really long time communicate better in person compared to rattling off electronic messages.

What does that say about communications among new employees?

E-mail ≠ Understanding

This doesn’t mean that e-mail is inherently ineffective or inimical. On the contrary, it’s an extremely useful but limited medium. Relying exclusively on it is rarely wise. Sometimes talking is a good idea.

Simon Says

Pick. Up. The. Phone.

Feedback

What say you?

philanimated

Navigation

BACKRANDOMNEXT

YOUR AD HERE

Filed Under



Enjoy this post? Click here to subscribe to this RSS feed or here to sign up for my bi-monthly newsletter.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *